Branding & Web Design for Land Development Company
- Branding
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Feb. 2016 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 4.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"They are great listeners and they want to get it right."
- Real estate
- Taylor, Mississippi
- 1-10 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Studio Sanderson helped with branding strategy and site redesign. They revamped the site to attract buyers through engaging content, and also assisted with social media, AdWords and Google Analytics.
Though conversion rates aren’t available yet, preliminary metrics show increased traffic, more leads and higher interest. Studio Sanderson is a proactive partner whose team has in-depth expertise. They provide pushback at appropriate times, and are dedicated to getting things right the first time.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
Splinter Creek Land Company is a land development company. Our development is in North Mississippi which is an upscale community with 25-26 home sites and modern houses. It is outside a university town called Oxford, Mississippi. We are in the process of doing a concept house. I am the general partner along with my husband.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Studio Sanderson?
We wanted to completely revamp our website and rebrand our company.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
We met with James [Principal of Studio Sanderson] and his team, and they began with a series of questions and interviews for some of our suppliers and partners. That process took three or four months. They came back with two or three iterations. They let us know what they heard and what they thought our strategic niche was. When we all agreed on the next step, we asked them to move forward in directing all of our digital presence in trying to overlay that brand theme around our digital strategy. Then they put that into practice and they completely redid our website.
We had a website before, and we thought it was great. It had beautiful images and fantastic copy, and we were very proud of it. But then as we began to talk about the fact that our goal was to develop an audience and ultimately attract buyers, we realized our website wasn’t delivering on that. It was more static than anything. James opened our eyes to the fact that the content has to be fresh, contemporaneous and constantly updated. We hired an internal marketing and communications director and James began to work with her on our Instagram feed and our Facebook presence in addition to our website. Every time I go to the site, I see something new. I see a new journal post or more Instagram photos. It’s a place you want to go back to. It’s not the static version that we had originally. We have also gotten into Google Analytics. We have monthly calls about what we are learning about our audience. It’s an evolving process and I really couldn’t be more pleased with James’ leadership.
We are continuing to move out the latest part of the contract. We’re getting more into Google AdWords and looking at target markets outside a 250-mile radius. Later this week we’re going to talk about some of the lessons learned with our AdWords strategy. We are doing some testing on different messages and seeing how that translates back to our traffic on our website and also in people requesting meetings and signing up for our newsletter.
Michelle Hannah [Head of Marketing and Operations] also worked with us, primarily with our marketing and communications director. Both she and James have been terrific.
How did you come to work with Studio Sanderson?
We found Sanderson through a mutual contact, the developer on Hudson Woods, which is in upstate New York. He had used James in the same capacity. We saw our development was very similar in concept. We were about the same size. We had the same timeline for our build-out. We both wanted modern homes and architecture was very much the important unifying concept. The Hudson Woods developer is also our architect, and it was on his recommendation that we brought James in. I wasn’t so sure we needed someone in New York since we are in Mississippi; I thought I could probably find someone locally. But then as we started our initial conversation with them, it became clear that James had the talent and the expertise to drive our branding and marketing. Hudson Woods is still a consultant with us, but my contract is directly with James, and it has morphed into a really great working relationship. James actually came to our site in Mississippi. We interviewed a number of folks that might be ancillary players.
How much have you invested with Studio Sanderson?
We have spent more than $100,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working with them in February 2016, and the site went live in November 2016. We continue to work with them.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?
We are seeing increased traffic. It’s ultimately about who we convert from an interested party into someone who is requesting information. The concept house that we are currently building will be completed this summer. Our preliminary metrics say more traffic, more leads and more interest. It is more a process of increasing volume, but we really hope to see the result of our contract with James turn into sales. We are in that preliminary period where the website has been built, we are monitoring traffic, we are gauging audience, we are trying to increase that, but until we have something to show and tell, we don’t expect to have actual sales until we get to the next phase.
How did Studio Sanderson perform from a project management standpoint?
They hit every deadline and have come in on budget. They have just been great to work with.
What did you find most impressive about Studio Sanderson?
They are great listeners and they want to get it right. In the early days, they may have had one vision for us, and we thought we knew our market and our sense of place better. They were very respectful of that. When they disagreed, they would push back. In the end, it was such a help to the partnership. There was some compromise. On our end, we learned a lot from them. They were patient teachers, and yet they were always totally respectful of what we are trying to do. James and Michelle led, but they led with input from us. I think they actually have grown to love our project, and it really shows in their work. I don’t know anything more validating than to feel like someone who started as a vendor is now a part of your team.
Are there any areas Studio Sanderson could improve?
If they were closer in geography, we could have more face-to-face time. I don’t see that as a limitation though. I can’t think of anything they could improve.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
"They approached it as more than building a website. Without understanding and helping us find our niche, the website would have been just another website, but it is really an extension of our brand. They started with a foundation and then built around it."
-
Schedule
4.0On time / deadlines
"I am busy and probably needed somebody to keep me on task."
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"I don’t have a lot to compare them to."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS