Hardware System Dev for Smart-Locking Furniture Company
- Engineering Other Design Product Design
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Oct. 2022 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 0.5
- Schedule
- 0.5
- Cost
- 0.5
- Willing to Refer
- 0.5
"The initial professionalism and promise never translated into meaningful results once the project began."
- Other industries
- Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- 1-10 Employees
- Online Review
- Verified
Speck Design has been hired by a smart-locking furniture firm to develop a hardware system that would control the locks on their furniture lines. They've handled the electrical, mechanical, and firmware design.
Speck Design has skipped the benchtop prototyping stage and presented a custom PCB prematurely, which has led to seven costly revisions over 18 months. Despite repeated assurances from the team, independent engineers have confirmed that the chosen chipset could never meet the required battery life.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and position.
I am the Founder of a smart-controlled furniture company.
Describe what your company does in a single sentence.
We make app-controlled, lockable furniture for the home, office and vacation property.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What specific goals or objectives did you hire Speck Design to accomplish?
- Build a new hardware device with 6 months battery life to control our locks.
SOLUTION
How did you find Speck Design?
Online Search
Why did you select Speck Design over others?
- Pricing fit our budget
- Great culture fit
- Company values aligned
- Appeared to be knowledgeable
How many teammates from Speck Design were assigned to this project?
2-5 Employees
Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.
In October of 2022, after a thorough interview process, I hired Speck Design to develop the hardware to control the locks my company uses in our furniture line. Their scope included the electrical, mechanical, and firmware design needed to move from concept to a manufacturable controller. The project covered system architecture, PCB and firmware development, mechanical integration, and engineering documentation for production readiness.
Key Deliverables:
- Hardware system architecture and component selection, with a benchtop model deliverable.
- PCB design and early firmware for Bluetooth-connected smart locks.
- Mechanical integration and prototype units for testing.
- Engineering files, BOM, and documentation for manufacturing.
The goal was to create a reliable, production-ready smart lock controller for our company that was small scale and had ample battery life so a cord was not needed.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
The engagement began with a goal to deliver a working smart lock hardware system in 10 weeks that would connect with our app and cloud. However, Speck Design skipped the benchtop prototyping stage, surpising us at our first deliverable meeting with a fully designed custom PCB instead of the benchtop model we were expecting to see. The promised 10 week timeline was missed, and over the next 18 months, the PCB had to be revised seven more times at my expense.
During this time, I frequently had to prompt progress updates, escalate communication, and even fly to their office to oversee the work in person after long periods without movement. Despite repeated assurances by the entire Speck team that the product would function as expected, the final board design has been confirmed by three independent electrical engineers to be incapable of meeting the required battery life due to the chipset Speck selected. Each independently questioned why the benchtop validation phase was skipped, as it would have identified this issue early in development.
To date, no functional production-ready hardware has been delivered, and the company stopped responding to communication regarding completion or refund in June 2025.
Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?
I had high hopes for Speck Design at the start. We were assigned a dedicated project manager, given a defined sprint schedule, and set up biweekly meetings to track progress. Unfortunately, as the months went on, communication and accountability broke down. Our project manager failed to follow up on action items, didn’t address valid concerns about missed deliverables, and stopped maintaining the timeline.
When progress stalled completely, I escalated my concerns to their sales person at Speck. She eventually replaced the project manager as our project manager, but offered little practical help—often deflecting my concerns by emphasizing how “great” the owner was and how experienced they were with projects like mine, as well as non-technical or non-traditional founders, which felt dismissive and patronizing because the timline was completely shot and I was nowhere near a working product.
Despite early structure and planning, project management ultimately became disorganized and unresponsive, with repeated delays and zero accountability for missed milestones.
What was your primary form of communication with Speck Design?
- In-Person Meeting
- Virtual Meeting
- Email or Messaging App
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
When I began searching for a hardware development partner, I contacted about a dozen companies and interviewed four in detail. In the end, it came down to two firms—but I chose Speck Design because they were the only team that took the time to truly dig into our project specifications and review our early non-functional prototype. Their proposal & team stood out as thorough, confident and capable.
They positioned themselves as experienced partners for non-technical and female founders, which made me feel supported at the start. My technical advisor, as well as our app and cloud developers, were also impressed with their capabilities and structured work plan.
Unfortunately, the initial professionalism and promise have never translated into meaningful results once the project began. What was promised in a 10 week sprint in 2022, hasn't been completed by 2025 and they are no longer returning any communication. We've been ghosted.
Are there any areas for improvement or something Speck Design could have done differently?
Speck Design could have greatly improved by maintaining stronger project management oversight and adhering to the transparent, milestone-based process they initially laid out. Skipping the benchtop prototype phase was THE mistake that set the entire project back—this step would have identified hardware and power management issues early, saving significant time and cost.
Better technical accountability, documentation, and communication would also have made a difference. I had to spend an additional $45k with our other development partner to overhaul our cloud and app systems to meet Speck's device, despite the scope of work stating that Speck would develop the device's software to connect up to our existing architecture. I also had to pay our other development partner to troubleshoot Speck's device as they provided little assistance unless we were able to pinpoint to them that it was their device that was the problem and where the problem was. We lost months because of this practice.
Consistent updates, honest assessments of challenges, debugging their work, and timely delivery of promised work would have gone a long way in maintaining trust. Instead of deflecting every one of our concerns, especially around the communication chips selected, the team should have been more collaborative to solve problems and uphold their original commitment to delivering a working, production-ready device, which they have not.
RATINGS
-
Quality
0.5Service & Deliverables
"I do not have a final product. What we have is unfinished and still buggy."
-
Schedule
0.5On time / deadlines
"I do not have a final product after 3 full years."
-
Cost
0.5Value / within estimates
"I paid in full, but do not have a final product and they are not returning our calls."
-
Willing to Refer
0.5NPS
"I am not only not recommending them, but I'm actively telling the other female founders in my network to steer clear of them.