Web App Development for Travel Abroad SaaS Company
- Web Development
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Oct. 2014 - Aug. 2015
- Quality
- 4.5
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"Idyllic ensured that we would be able to deliver a complete deliverable, instead of only a piece of one."
- Other industries
- Denver, Colorado
- 11-50 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Idyllic designed and developed a software-as-a-service web application for the travel-abroad planning process for students. They also did business analysis and quality assurance. Their work built upon an alpha product.
Idyllic was mindful of cost and worked to achieve the specified goals. They delivered a product that could survive on the market and generate needed user feedback. The team was communicative and receptive to feedback. They delivered sprints regularly.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
Project Travel was a software-as-a-service platform which worked with education offices, helping students travel abroad for study, volunteering, and so on. Our aim was to remove the paper process and digitize it for a more seamless experience, helping more students travel abroad.
I was the founder and chief executive officer of the company.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Idyllic?
There were other companies offering pieces of what our platform was, but we were the first to provide a product of this type. We were pioneering new territory in terms of covering the overall experience of a student wanting to plan their trip through an application. The technical challenge was creating a platform without an existing example. It was built from scratch, from our brains, and through user testing.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Idyllic has worked on our web-based app. One of the reasons for engaging Idyllic was that we knew we'd be able to achieve the web coding piece, from an architecture and planning perspective, up to the deployment of the code. We had an internal designer, but we also worked with Idyllic's design team. They also provided a business analyst, user testing, and quality assurance services.
We also had some developers which worked alongside Idyllic's team. Idyllic ensured that we would be able to deliver a complete deliverable, instead of only a piece of one.
Idyllic's coding was mostly on the backend, coordinating with our front-end person. We provided them our wireframes and documentation as a basis, and we had also built an alpha product. Idyllic was working on the beta version which could be put through user testing.
How did you come to work with Idyllic?
Our startup was based in Boulder, Colorado, but we met with Idyllic through our network in Chicago. We heard some great reviews about the company, but also interviewed several local shops.
There's always a stigma of using a non-US company, but we stayed open to what was possible. We met with Idyllic's founder and some of the team and found them to be thoughtful in their presentation. They understood our platform and gave us a good vibe. We knew the cost would be lower, but it was also important for us to find a company which could offer a long-term collaboration. For the same price we paid Idyllic, we would have bought one month of a US shop's time. Using a long-term partner would allow us to deploy code, interact with users, get feedback, and implement it.
How much have you invested with Idyllic?
The cost of our project was around $150,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working with Idyllic in October 2014. We originally had a 3-month project with Idyllic. The time span increased by one month as we added new items. After this, we continued to work with one of Idyllic's team members directly for another 6 months. The project ended fully in August 2015.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?
Because Idyllic was mindful of cost, they worked with us in taking the platform to the next level, while still taking the time and cost factors into consideration. Many shops promote doing things right out of the gate, which will translate into doing 100% of the testing and perfecting. We mainly wanted an app which could survive for a year and generate user feedback, so we were okay with it not being fully buttoned-up. Idyllic was receptive to that. They delivered good results and didn't simply code based on their individual egos, giving us things which we didn't need. Idyllic worked based on our business goals, listened to our instructions, and took initiative appropriately.
The quality of the site was in line with what we discussed and expected. It may not have been the perfect site based on other people's standards, but it was perfect for our needs. Nothing was overbuilt or reaching beyond our business goals.
How did Idyllic perform from a project management standpoint?
Outside of the technical aspects, Idyllic showed us how to best work with a remote team. We came upon the normal challenges of collaborating in this fashion, but Idyllic was very good in terms of coordinating and taking feedback. I have used these methodologies for building a relationship in other third-party collaborations.
In an Agile world, the meaning of deadlines gets a bit lost. Idyllic delivered sprints regularly. Because we had a large time difference, I had calls with the team at night. When our local developers were wrapping up for the day, they could make notes for Idyllic's team and see the progress the next day. I don't recall having issues with deadlines, beyond the scope creep on our side. There are no perfect relationships in development, but Idyllic did a good job of being conscious of timelines, deployment, and communication.
What did you find most impressive about Idyllic?
After spending time with Idyllic's team and their founder, I've come to value their integrity and leadership. Whenever we had any concerns or questions, Idyllic's principal responded to us. I could tell that his team believed in his leadership and followed the integrity he set in terms of how to work with clients, how to follow their needs, what the code quality standard is, and so on. Idyllic's principal does an excellent job in exuding his passion for technology. I've come to look for the same elements in other relationships.
Are there any areas Idyllic could improve?
Because of our specific position of building a second beta while still pioneering a new product, there were many questions for which we didn't have an answer. Idyllic's team was excited to join us in this adventure, which made us too excited at times over what was possible. There were a few times when we stepped into a certain story, only to discover that it was bigger than we'd realized. Idyllic could work more with clients in ensuring that last minute client ideas don't become distracting, which is a hard task.
I'm very pleased with the relationship overall, and I put the responsibility of figuring things out more on our side. Idyllic's team could have said no to us on more occasions, but that would have impacted our path to innovation.
RATINGS
-
Quality
4.5Service & Deliverables
"There were some challenges in terms of time zone, but the quality was good. I would definitely work with Idyllic again."
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
"Idyllic was good at accommodating us, staying up late or working until early in the morning in order to have meetings."
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"Having a lower relative cost meant that we had more flexibility on how we spent our time together, ultimately achieving more."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS
"I have referred Idyllic within the startup community. I've also recommended Idyllic to people who needed a developer that could spin-up a module quickly.