Software Development for Design Access Equipment Company
- Custom Software Development
- $200,000 to $999,999
- Mar. 2021 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 4.0
- Cost
- 4.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
“They’re bang-on with their expertise, timeline, and budget.”
- Manufacturing
- United Kingdom
- 11-50 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Geeks Ltd is designing and developing a cloud platform for an access control equipment company. They’ve created wireframes from the client’s requirements and user stories.
Geeks Ltd is on track to deliver the cloud platform on time and within budget. The client has been especially impressed with their ability to understand their industry and translate that into wireframes for development. Their custom management tools are a key factor in their success.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the acting commercial director of Telguard. We design, manufacture, and sell access control equipment.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Geeks Ltd?
We’ve employed Geeks Ltd to help us move away from dial-up support and move to a cloud platform. We’ve needed to future-proof our company. We don’t have the in-house expertise to build that cloud platform, and we don’t want to spend time learning that process. What we do know is what we need the product to look like.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
We’ve had high-level discussions with the Geeks Ltd team about what we’re trying to achieve. They’ve captured user stories about how we do business and support our products. They’ve translated those user stories into wireframes, so they can communicate our requirements via technical specifications that make sense to their software design engineers. The wireframing took about a month.
They’re developing the cloud platform from scratch. We expect to complete the first build stage in the next few weeks.
What is the team composition?
We work directly with a project manager, and they have a teammate who coordinates between the project manager and the software engineers. Before we started the project, we worked with a business analyst who translated our needs and user stories into technical specifications.
How did you come to work with Geeks Ltd?
The CEO and owner of our company had a good working relationship with the CEO and owner of Geeks Ltd. When we researched them and some of their other customers, we recognized that they were a very professional and capable company that we could trust to complete this project to our satisfaction.
We didn’t invite bids from other companies. When we saw Geeks Ltd’s process for interpreting our needs and delivering our desired results, it was extremely structured and competent. We knew that we were interacting with capable people, and we felt confident that Geeks Ltd was the right company to select.
How much have you invested with them?
We’ve invested around £250,000 (approximately $335,000 USD), a significant part of our product budget.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working with Geeks Ltd around February or March 2021, and the project is still in progress. We expect the project to conclude in March 2022.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
Without their work, our company would become limited in what we can offer to our customers. Geeks Ltd’s initial scoping has been excellent. Their understanding of how our complex field works has been just terrific, and that has been reflected in their detailed wireframes.
When we’ve read through those wireframes, out of hundreds of pieces of work we’ve found very few errors to correct or clarifications to make. Their success rate was way above 60%, which is an excellent start.
How did Geeks Ltd perform from a project management standpoint?
They’re bang-on with their expertise, timeline, and budget. They use a management platform that they’ve built themselves — that platform has been the key success factor in their workflow. They have a management dashboard, a day-to-day operating communication platform, and a project management platform.
Through their communication platform, which we have logins for, we're able to stay on top of what Geeks Ltd is working on. We communicate daily through email — their platform emails us when there’s something we need to look at in the management platform. Whenever we’ve encountered contingencies, we’ve been able to capture, prioritize, and schedule or defer them appropriately.
Their management dashboard displays where they are in terms of the overall project timeline and budget. Their project management style has been based on sprints with predefined elements. There have been about 40–50 pieces of work, which they’ve grouped together logically into 15 sprints. Each sprint has lasted about three weeks.
They’ve had two people assigned to us at the project management level at a time. Whenever there was something to correct or clarify, their business analyst would step back in to revisit the specification from a user story point of view.
We’ve had a total of three project managers with Geeks Ltd, as they tend to get poached by other companies or leave the company. Geeks Ltd hasn’t missed a beat in the handoff between project managers one and two, broadly speaking. There’s a third project manager now taking over from the second one, but we’re at the very end and I’m fully expecting it to be the same seamless handover.
We hold a two-hour weekly project call every Wednesday afternoon with the project manager and other members of Geeks Ltd’s team. On the odd occasion that we’ve needed to rescope something or otherwise explore it in significant detail, we’ve scheduled a separate meeting with the relevant players.
The acid test will be when we perform end-to-end testing of the entire product, instead of just testing isolated parts. When they hand the product over to us for user acceptance testing (UAT) in their environment, we’ll have a very clear understanding of what they have built versus our requirements so that testing will be very straightforward, thanks to their management tools.
What did you find most impressive about them?
We’ve been very impressed with their ability to understand our access control equipment world and translate it into terms that they can work with in their software engineering world. The devil’s in the details, and there’s a lot of technical complexity and jargon relevant to our field.
Geeks Ltd’s ability to quickly understand and talk to us in our own language was astonishing to start with. We really felt that people in our company might have taken a year to get to the same level of understanding that Geeks Ltd has exhibited after only a few weeks.
Are there any areas they could improve?
They’ve struggled a bit to give us a management overview dashboard that we can use to assess the status of the deliverables relative to the budget at a glance. They’ve had the data, but they haven’t had a way to communicate it. The initial lack of that tool has delayed our realization that we had a risk of overspending. So we’ve become very focused in the last two months of work on meeting the project budgets, timelines, and deliverables.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
Follow best practices by being as utterly clear as you can about the scope of work and the engagement around the scope of work.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
4.0On time / deadlines
-
Cost
4.0Value / within estimates
"This project is expensive, but we’ve been very satisfied with what we’ve gotten for our money so far."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS