We Create Brands That Demand Attention

Gold
VERIFIED

We create brands that demand attentionand that deliver brand performance.

We are a team of experts from branding, strategy, advertising, design &  digital – even, ex-client side people too.

For 30 years we’ve created brands with distinction helping our clients’ brands get an unfair share of attention, competitive advantage, and to grow.

Our Services: 

- Brand Strategy

- Brand Naming

- Brand Identity

 
$50,000+
 
$200 - $300 / hr
 
2 - 9
 Founded
1999
Show all +
New York City, NY
headquarters
  • 110 East 25th Street, 1st Floor
    New York City, NY 10001
    United States
other locations
  • 2980 McFarlane Road, 2nd Floor
    Miami, FL 33133
    United States
  • 2619 Stout Street
    Denver, CO 80205
    United States

Portfolio

Key clients: 

We’ve helped to create some of the world's biggest brands as well as create brands for early-stage start-ups and entrepreneurs. WANT Branding is one of the world’s leading branding agencies. It’s where great brands begin.

Royal Caribbean International

Services:

Naming the “Quantum” Class and the cruise ships within the class 

Naming Architecture for the overarching cruise ship classes and ships 

Naming onboard neighbourhoods, suites, restaurants, amenities & other branded elements 

 

Read full case study at: 

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/royal-caribbean

Intuitive Surgical & Da Vinci Surgical Systems

Services:

Naming Intuitive’s latest generation of the Da Vinci system (the Da Vinci Xi, X and SP) 

Naming Ion™,  a new robotic endoluminal platform for minimally invasive peripheral lung biopsy

Naming SmartFire technology used in the world’s first fully wristed, 60mm surgical stapler  

Brand Architecture for over 300 product SKU's, features and

technologies

Name Decision Tool to guide naming strategy for future brands, products, and software innovations 

Product Codification and Labeling for surgical tools and their parts 

 

Read full case study at:

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/intuitive/

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Services:

Naming Hewlett Packard Enterprise 

 

Read full case study at:

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/hpe

Call Of Duty: Infinite Warfare

Services: 

Naming Activision's 13th instalment of the Call Of Duty franchise: Infinite Warfare

 

Read full case study at: 

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/call-of-duty

Kork Inc

Services: 

Renaming a blockchain data platform 

 

Case study coming soon. 

 

 

 

MGM Resorts International

Expertise:

Renaming MGM-Mirage to MGM Resorts International

Renaming 'Players Club’ rewards brand to ‘M Life’

Naming Architecture for 'M Life' program tiers Sapphire, Pearl, Gold, Platinum, and Noir

Naming Wet Republic Ultra Pool 

Naming the Aria Hotel 

Naming ‘ThePark' a $450M multi-use outdoor space connecting the New York-New York and Monte

Carlo casinos. 

 

Read full case study at:

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/mgm

Sirius XM Radio

Services:

Naming the world's first commercialized satellite radio

 

Read full case study at:

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/SiriusXM

Anheuser Busch's Veza Sur

Services: 

Naming Veza Sur Brewing Company 

 

Read full case study at: 

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/ab-inbev

Gillette Mach 3

Services: 

Naming the Mach 3

 

Read full case study at: 

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/SiriusXM

Dell Inspiron

Services: 

Naming the Dell Inspiron Computer 

 

Read full case study at: 

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/dell

OneWorld Airline Alliance

Services: 

Naming OneWorld global airline alliance

 

Read full case study at: 

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/oneworld

The Chemours Company

Services: 

Naming DuPont's spin-off company for 'Performance Chemicals', The Chemours Company

 

Read the full case study at: 

https://wantbranding.com/case-studies/Chemours

 

Reviews

Sort by

Brand Identity for Gaming & Data Visualization Company

"Everything they created is spot on. From a messaging standpoint, they got who we are in our DNA."

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
4.5
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Dec. 2017 - Mar. 2018
Project summary: 

As part of a rebranding, WANT Branding redesigned and iterated a logo and other aspects of the visual identity. They also created a new mission and vision statement.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
New York, New York
Eric Bogard
Head of Marketing, Arkadium
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The new logo was particularly well-received, with overwhelmingly positive internal and external feedback. Direct contact with, and work by, WANT Branding executives not only enhanced the project creatively, but also demonstrated a vested interest in long-term outcomes and customer business needs.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the head of marketing at Arkadium. We produce interactive content in the form of games and interactive data visualizations for brands (e.g., NBA or Nike) and publishers (e.g., Washington Post or CNN).

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with WANT Branding?

Arkadium has been around for 17 years and gone through a number of transitions. A major shift happened a few years ago, which was moving from a consumer-facing company to one that was solely B2B. We wanted to hire an agency to help us create new messaging on who we are and what we stand for, as well as coming up with a new visual identity.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

The first step of the process was a discovery phase. WANT Branding met with Arkadium executives to understand their role, their challenges, and what the company means to them. They did historical research of old press releases and articles. They also sat down with us to understand our current market focus and objectives.

After the discovery phase, WANT Branding put all their findings together. Then they launched an initial draft of our message and visual identity. Several versions were presented, including logos and style guides. Next, they worked with us to finalize the message and iterate on the visual identity until we were satisfied.

What is the team composition?

We mainly worked with two people, their managing director and their head of marketing.

How did you come to work with WANT Branding?

It was an exhaustive search. We approached about 20 agencies. Our criteria included everything from experience within our industry, to a preference for a local New York City vendor, to price point. After the qualification process and in-person meetings, our team was most excited to move forward with WANT Branding.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent $43,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

The project took place from December 2017–March 2018.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Everything they created is spot on. From a messaging standpoint, they got who we are in our DNA. That's something that was lacking previously. There’s a real sense of excitement around the new visual identity. It's modern, clean, and sophisticated. We’ve gotten a lot of positive feedback both internally and externally to the new logo.

How did WANT Branding perform from a project management standpoint?

They led us through all phases of the project. I typically take the lead role so it was great that they stepped up in that way. They were on top of everything.

What did you find most impressive about them?

I really appreciated how much their managing director was involved with the project. A lot of agencies use their top executives when they’re pitching, but then they disappear. That's not the case with WANT Branding. They had several senior people working and executing on our account.

Are there any areas they could improve?

The only little thing that sticks in my mind is that, at least initially, the visual elements were generic. They looked like they could be applied to anybody and probably were used for other accounts. I got the sense that they were trying to steer us in a particular direction.

4.5
Overall Score We're very happy with the engagement.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They led us, which was unique and appreciated.
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They were on the low end of the agencies we considered.
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    We're very happy with their final deliverables.
  • 4.5 NPS
    Willing to refer
    I’d definitely recommend them.

Renaming for Design & Architecture Awards Company

"They did an excellent job. ... I was very happy with everything."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
May - June 2018
Project summary: 

Assisting with a rebranding campaign, WANT Branding provided recommendations for a new name and did a trademark research.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
New York, New York
Head of Marketing, Design Awards Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The in-house team is highly satisfied and the business is growing. WANT Branding went above and beyond to understand and meet all needs, while their enthusiasm, personable approach, and professionalism made them a go-to partner.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

Our company organizes awards in different fields of art, such as architecture, photography, and design. I'm the head of marketing.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with WANT Branding?

We were working on rebranding and needed help with finding a new name for our company.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We discussed our goals with them and helped them understand our business and our strategic position. Then, we went through three rounds of naming, where they delivered their recommendations. They also did a trademark research for us.

What is the team composition?

I mostly worked with Jonathan (Managing Director, WANT Branding), Bruno (Senior Director, WANT Branding) and Celeste (Brand Consultant, WANT Branding).

How did you come to work with them?

I found them on Clutch. At that time, I was considering about six other companies. WANT Branding was eager to understand our challenges, and I liked their attitude, so I chose them.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent a little over $10,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked with them between May–June 2018.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We're still in the market phase, but we’ve already seen improvements in our business compared to the last year.

How did they perform from a project management standpoint?

They worked quickly and brought a lot of ideas to the table. They gave us plenty of names to choose from, so that was a very positive experience. Also, they're a fun team to work with.

What did you find most impressive about them?

I liked Jonathan's personality and the fact that he's fast and smart.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No. I was very happy with everything.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They met their deadlines and worked much faster than the other vendors I hired in the past.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They made me the best offer.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They did an excellent job.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Rebranding for Strategic Advisory Firm Client

"The talent that WANT Branding brings is impressive; they’re smart and hardworking."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$50,000 to $199,999
 
Apr. - Dec. 2016
Project summary: 

WANT Branding led a rebranding process that included providing renaming options, performing market research, and offering multiple opportunities for collaboration.  

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Miami, Florida
Matthew Yale
Partner, Tusk Ventures
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The rebranding efforts WANT Branding provided satisfied the end-client’s needs. The team has received positive feedback on their work and management process. They have been hired for their services by the same agency multiple times because of their successful work. 

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m a partner at Tusk Ventures, a strategic advisory firm with traditional venture clients. 

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with WANT Branding?

We were working with a client who needed to undergo rebranding and renaming for many of their properties. The client was a national improvement retailer.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

WANT Branding began by doing an overall assessment of the company’s brand from top to bottom. They did store visits, online customer interviews, focus groups, and background. They created a baseline of the current status of the brand and met with our team and senior management to review what they discovered. They then performed a strategic brand assessment and gave provided multiple rounds for feedback. They delivered everything from customer giveaways to signage.

What is the team composition?

We worked with Jonathan (CEO, WANT Branding).

How did you come to work with WANT Branding?

I found Jonathan through a former colleague that had worked with him in the past. He was recommended to us because of his smart, hands-on experience.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent roughly $100,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked from April to December 2016.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

There aren’t exact metrics on our end, but I hired them to work with more clients because of their performance on this project. Our end-client loved their work and found them very easy to work with.

How did WANT Branding perform from a project management standpoint?

They were excellent to work with; they met deadlines and were very receptive to feedback.

What did you find most impressive about them?

The talent that WANT Branding brings is impressive; they’re smart and hardworking. He always gives us a number of choices and thinks of multiple approaches.

Are there any areas they could improve?

There is nothing that I can think of.

5.0
Overall Score Excellent, we really enjoyed working with them.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They had no issues getting us what we wanted, when we wanted it.
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They were reasonable and willing to be somewhat flexible on pricing.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They absolutely exceeded expectations.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    We’ve already had them work on 2 other projects.

Naming Assistance for Branding Firm

"They have an incredibly structured, thorough system that was unbelievable."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$50,000 to $199,999
 
Mar. 2016 - Mar. 2017
Project summary: 

WANT Branding provided naming and branding assistance. They researched, created a brand direction, and provided essential information on the targeted market.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Miami, Florida
President, Branding Firm
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The work WANT Branding produced aided to the increase in sales and awareness of the brand. They provided structured, professional insight that guided the brand in developing a name that would resonate in their market.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the president of a creative agency that includes branding. We mainly come up with brand strategies, and from there we build out the entire brand. This includes website development, search engine optimization, and social media campaigns.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with WANT Branding?

We needed to create a new digital bank for the U.S. market and we required naming and branding assistance.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

They walked us through the naming process; they presented us and our end-client with the name options for feedback. They researched the industry, clarified our brand direction, and created a narrative about where the general industry of digital banking is going.

What is the team composition?

We worked regularly with Jonathan (Managing Director, WANT Branding) and Bruno (Senior Director, WANT Branding). Jonathan handled presentations, strategy, and concepts behind everything. Bruno worked on the creative portion of the project and performed research. We also worked with their legal partner on finding trademark availability.

How did you come to work with WANT Branding?

Their company is local to Miami and we had heard of their work with bigger brands. We knew that they had experience in naming, especially within the financial sector.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent $50,000 on this project.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from March 2016 to March 2017.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We don’t have any metrics at the moment, but we built a brand new digital bank. In terms of awareness and sales, we’ve seen positive results.

How did WANT Branding perform from a project management standpoint?

They were excellent, in terms of project management. They have an incredibly structured, thorough system that was unbelievable. We mostly communicated via email and also use Teamwork.

What did you find most impressive about them?

The most impressive aspect of working with them was how well they presented their ideas.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, I think they have their process down.

Any advice for potential customers?

If you can find them when they are available, get them. They’re busy but they’re very good.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Branding & Naming for Think Tank Business

"I’ve worked with a lot of branding firms, but nobody has impressed me in the way that WANT Branding has."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Sept. - Nov. 2016
Project summary: 

WANT Branding provided naming and other brand identity services for an emerging firm. The goal was to develop a persona that reflected trustworthiness and created an emotional attachment to the consumer.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
San Diego, California
John Girard
CEO, Flux
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The completed materials clearly resonated with brand users, a product of WANT Branding’s meticulous approach to project management and evident expertise in the space. They are well-organized and strive for efficiency, but they are equally accommodating and open-minded to alternative schedules. 

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

At the time of the project, I was the CEO of Flux, which was an early stage fintech business that built technology for entrepreneurs. Flux has since been absorbed into another entity.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with WANT Branding?

We engaged WANT Branding in the early stages of the business, when branding and naming were going to be critical to our success. We were operating in a crowded space, and financial services businesses generally have a high bar when it comes to building brand trust. We contracted with WANT Branding to make sure we did it well.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

It was a very disciplined and methodical eight-week process that involved meetings in person, online, and over the phone. We started with big-picture questions of what we wanted the brand to represent and what kind of emotional attachments we hoped to create with users of the brand. We boiled that down to a critical value statement about who we were. That then sparked conversations about brand position and naming. Throughout the process, we sought input from the principals in our organization. Investors, advisors, and other luminaries in financial services weighed in, as well.

What is the team composition?

We worked solely with Jonathan, a brand strategist.

How did you come to work with WANT Branding?

I first became aware of WANT Branding because of a naming and branding presentation Jonathan gave at a TED Conference. I was intrigued by his approach and the thoughtful way he discussed the process in the space. Our first call was to him, and after speaking with three or four other providers, it was clear WANT Branding was the best choice.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent around $30,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

Our engagement lasted from September through November 2016.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

With this kind of a project, you can only determine the success by how much the brand resonates with the industry and the people in it. You can always tell if you got it wrong because customers will tell you. But it’s clear that WANT Branding got it right because we received positive feedback regarding our presence.

How did WANT Branding perform from a project management standpoint?

They strike the right balance between driving hard to make sure everybody provides the feedback they need to in order for deadlines to be met, and showing a soft touch and being flexible when the moment calls for it.

What did you find most impressive about them?

WANT Branding has an evident expertise in the industry. I’ve worked with a lot of branding firms, but nobody has impressed me in the way that WANT Branding has. If this process is done well, you likely end up with several strong-willed people having passionate conversations, and WANT Branding is able to navigate those and reach a common ground.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    It's a difficult process to run smoothly, but they do it well.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    To do this well is not inexpensive, but it's worth it to pay for their expertise.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They are head and shoulders above the other vendors I've worked with in this space.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    I recommend them quite frequently.

Naming & Branding for Time Warner Cable

"We sometimes tested WANT's names against others and theirs were always the top."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$200,000 to $999,999
 
2009 - 2011
Project summary: 

WANT Branding provided name generation services, working on retainer for a large media company. They worked on multiple rounds of names and presented names in a thoughtful, cohesive and visual manner.

The Reviewer
 
10,000+ Employees
 
New York, New York
Kate Rozen
Sr. Director of Brand Strategy, Time Warner Cable
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Their deliverables were always excellent and of the highest quality, demonstrating their dedication and creativity. They offered a variety of options at all stages and created additional complimentary documents to facilitate the process.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

At the time, I was senior director of brand strategy for Time Warner Cable. The company has since been purchased.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with WANT Branding?

We realized that the naming function and some of the branding elements had been done outside of marketing for too long, so we were looking at how we could handle naming going forward. Previous naming projects had been done by the people who came up with the product, feature, or service that was going to launch, and not through marketing. This is how we became involved with WANT Branding. My role was to create, build, and own the branding functionality for the organization during the project.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

They were initially brought in to help us determine if we wanted to do a relaunch and a rebrand for the organization generally, meaning whether we would change the name of “Time Warner Cable” to something else. For various reasons, that project didn’t proceed. However, we were happy and impressed with their work, so decided to put them on retainer for naming in general.

They offered us multiple rounds of names. I think we went through four to five names per month, but we also worked on what we called “naming maps." They always did different rounds for us, as well as initial trademark searches. Following that, they would partner with our own legal team in order to ensure that the proper trademark classes were checked.

What is the team composition?

We worked with different people, mainly under the leadership of Jonathan (CEO and Founder, WANT Branding). He had a hands-on approach and his expertise was extremely helpful to the process at large.

How did you come to work with WANT Branding?

We found a few providers initially. WANT had the right combination of an effective, inspiring leader, in addition to the right price point for us. Their initial presentation for the potential company rebrand was very good. Even though we didn’t do that project, we were sold on them overall.

How much have you invested with them?

The overall cost of the project was around $500,000. We averaged $30,000–$35,000 per month on the retainer, across a couple of years.

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working with them at the end of 2009 and worked with them for the next 2–3 years.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

When we presented the naming maps to our company, a colleague told me it was one of the most impressive conversations he’d had all year. That was a nice metric for the success of the work we’d done. We received feedback from executives about the positive and successful names we came up with.

We took a couple of names created by WANT and used them for brand-new products for the company. For example, the first time the company went into the security space in a big way, they used the name “Intelligent Home”, which came from WANT.

We sometimes tested WANT's names against others and theirs were always the top. The simple fact of keeping a naming agency on retainer for a few years if pretty rare. I would work with WANT again in a second.

How did WANT Branding perform from a project management standpoint?

One of our leaders was a bit quicker to change things around and wanted changes all the time. They responded quickly to that and adjusted timelines effectively. Within the same day or week, we would make changes, but they would handle it very well. We felt that things were well-organized and that WANT was a true partner.

They were very easy to work with and easy to talk to. If someone asked me for a naming agency or a brand identity expert, they would usually be on my shortest list.

What did you find most impressive about them?

The idea of the naming maps for looking at the company at large is what distinguished WANT in my mind. Instead of doing their work in a vacuum, they took the time to set up meetings with the right people, and they encouraged my participation. They were able to do the work in a thorough way, without a lot of back and forth.

Not having a huge staff helped keep the cost down. It allowed us to keep them on for as long as we did. It made us feel like we were getting a lot of value: we received a naming policy manual, naming advisory and development, and other things that added value to the actual name generation. It was unique for me at the time, and since. It helped me create advisory documents when communicating a new name to the company. These are extra, above-and-beyond things that come to my mind, and helped distinguish them from the general services we might have gotten from another provider.

The names themselves also felt as though they hadn’t just been generated by a computer. Many bigger agencies made us feel like the names were computer-generated. I felt that the work with WANT was much more strategic and thorough.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I’m sure that, at the time, I could have mentioned things to work on and improve. In hindsight, it was a great relationship, it was helpful to the organization at large, and we definitely felt that we got our value for money every month. For those reasons, I really can’t think of a negative right now.

5.0
Overall Score Due to their leadership, meticulousness, effectiveness, and the actual names themselves.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    We did some course-correcting and they reacted beautifully each time, though it wasn't easy.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    I felt that they were less expensive than other providers, likely because they work more nimbly.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    There was a strategic rationale that came with their naming decisions.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    Years later, and after having worked with other companies, they still rise to the top of my list.

Product Naming for Medical Device Company

“They weren’t afraid to educate us so that we could make better decisions and evaluate their work more effectively.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$200,000 to $999,999
 
Nov. 2016 - Dec. 2017
Project summary: 

WANT aided in defining business goals and a brand architecture before building a naming hierarchy strategy. They performed a product inventory to create a historical framework and helped name several products.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
San Francisco, California
Director of Product Branding, Medical Device Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Streamlining a once-chaotic process, WANT moved through a tedious inventory process to ensure construction of a successful naming strategy. They worked effectively in a collaborative environment and were open to feedback, all while remaining adaptive to different project management styles.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

We are a multi-billion dollars medical device company with products in the minimally invasive surgical space. I’m the director of product branding.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with WANT Branding?

We had a major initiative with a new product that we needed to name.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We started with defining our business goals and brand architecture before creating a stable framework and strategy to establish the original project scope.

We subsequently engaged with them to help with strategic naming and development of our naming hierarchy for the company. They ended up doing an inventory of all of our product names and creating a framework to understand them. They collaborated with us to develop a new hierarchy and also used the emerging framework to help me name several products simultaneously. We used their international language capabilities to check if our proposed names had issues in different countries.

The first contract was a very specific statement of work around helping us name a product. The second one was a retainer where the scope of work was much more strategic, leading to development of an overall naming hierarchy that informed various individual naming projects. The individual product naming projects were part of the retainer, where the strategic work also included naming a set quota of projects per month.

What is the team composition?

We worked with their founder and CEO as well as a senior director who did a lot of the name and heavy lifting. Celeste (Brand Consultant, WANT Branding) handled the project management.

How did you come to work with WANT Branding?

A consultant we’d been working with on brand strategies recommended them to us.  He said he knew several other naming consultancies, but felt that WANT was more strategic.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent between $180,000–$240,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from November 2016 until December 2017.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

They performed an inventory of our existing product names (700-800 names) and organized them into four categories. They were able to make sense of the names we had used the past and propose a naming decision tree to help us make decisions of when and how to create future product names. We ended up using that filter tree to develop a naming hierarchy in conjunction with them that's been pretty successful.

How did WANT Branding perform from a project management standpoint?

Celeste did a good job. I have a pretty strong project management background and found them fairly flexible in adapting their style to ours. It worked well.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They were very willing to work in a deeply collaborative way with us. They weren’t afraid to educate us so that we could make better decisions and evaluate their work more effectively. They were very open to feedback around other strategic considerations they needed to think about. It was a very natural and open type of working model, which I really enjoyed. Consultants can sometimes want a much clearer statement of work to control the scope. Because we worked on a retainer basis, it was much easier for us to act strategically and flex the work to what was important and necessary.

Are there any areas they could improve?

While they were very strategic, I think they could have gone even further in that area. Perhaps we were an unusual client in that regard.

4.5
Overall Score We had certain strategic, high-level demands. They had to get used to it, but they’d be able to match that if we worked together again.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    We have no complaints. They were very responsive to our scheduling needs.
  • 4.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They were a little expensive.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They were tremendously collaborative and really took all input into account. They provided us with great options.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    They’re definitely on the list of people I would recommend.

Naming Strategy for Design & Production Firm

“They have experience in a variety of industries and a level of subtlety that other agencies lack.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Jan. - May 2017
Project summary: 

WANT Branding named a product for a design firm. They considered international language nuance and presented descriptive options that could be trademarked.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
Hayward, California
Paul Chapuis
Founder & CEO, OnQ
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The name catches industry attention and garners interviews, placements, and mentions in trade articles. WANT Branding was collaborative and responded well to the internal creative team.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the founder and CEO of two companies. OnQ is a retail display company for the tech industry. The second company, June 20, is the company that WANT Branding assisted. June 20 brings rich, interactive content into stores and creates a suite of software/hardware hybrid solutions for the shelf level.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with WANT Branding?

We needed a name for our product. We wanted something descriptive and catchy that could be trademarked.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We’re a creative company, so we asked them to change their strategy to include our people. They came to us and walked us through the process of coming up with great names. They included us much more than other agencies might. It was a fun project. They’re incredibly good at their job and we learned a little about their process.

In the world of naming, there’s a lot of back and forth. They brought us a list of possible names to choose from. Once we had a shortlist, we needed to make sure our options were available to trademark. Even with a great list, there were little details we hadn’t considered. We ultimately reached our final decision with their help.

What is the team composition?

There were a few members of the team who contributed to logos and follow-ups, but we primarily worked with Jonathan [Managing Director, WANT Branding].

How did you come to work with WANT Branding?

I met Jonathan at a TED conference years ago. When we considered who could help us with our naming initiative, I remembered our interaction and called him up. He came to us with a pitch we could agree on and started workshopping.

How much have you invested with them?

Start to finish, we spent around $30,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working on the project in January 2017. Our engagement lasted three or four months.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

The impact has been marvelous. We’re nearing the end of our funding round and have a lot of the devices in the field. We’ve done a number of tradeshows. Since the name is so catchy, we’ve had interviews, placements, and mentions in a lot of trade articles. The name mattered a lot more than we thought it would.

How did WANT Branding perform from a project management standpoint?

They were terrific across the board. I didn’t realize how complicated the process would be going in and was initially bewildered by the price. I had no idea how much went into a really good name, especially considering international and language nuance.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They’re really gifted. They listen to recommendations and can parse out what will work and why. They’re very collaborative and good at working with our creative team. I was pleased by how well they reacted and responded to us.

Are there any areas they could improve?

There isn’t anything they need to improve. They walked us through the process with a great deal of skill and pizzazz and found us a wonderfully descriptive name we could protect. I don’t have any negatives.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

They have experience in a variety of industries and a level of subtlety that other agencies lack. They pick names that match the class of trade. Any potential customer should take advantage of that ability.

5.0
Overall Score It was a really good experience.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They did well. We’re in a different time zone, but that never got in the way.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    The value is based on how well the name and the company do in the market.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They did what we asked them to and executed the project in a remarkable way.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Naming for New Coffee Brand

"They have the ideal balance of creativity and practical trademark knowledge."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Apr. - May 2017
Project summary: 

WANT Branding led a naming exercise for a new brand. They researched the target audiences, recorded branding objectives, and presented several rounds of names for feedback. 

The Reviewer
 
501-1000 Employees
 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Christopher Brown
Director of Marketing, RTD Beverage Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The name crafted by WANT Branding sparked the team's creativity and served as a starting point for multiple advertising campaigns. Throughout the process, the agency demonstrated their collaborative, client-focused methodology, clear communication style, and thoughtful aptitude for branding.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I am the director of marketing for a food and beverage company that is entering the cold brew coffee category with a line of shelf-stable, authentic coffee blends.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire WANT Branding?

We needed a name for our new cold brew coffee brand, so we hired WANT Branding to guide our internal marketing and design team through a naming exercise.

What were your goals for this project?

We were building a purpose-driven brand towards discerning young consumers, so we needed a catchy, recognizable brand name that would resonate with that audience.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

I had a great experience working with Jonathan in the past on a similar project at another company. After discussing the challenge and objectives of the project, Jonathan prepared a proposal that he shared with my team and our senior leadership.

The proposal outlined his team's significant experience, a phased collaborative approach to the project, the duration, and the costs.

After reviewing the proposal, it was clear that WANT Branding was the right partner for us. Our decision was based on their experience and their ability to deliver on budget within a short amount of time.

Describe the scope of their work in detail.

To begin, the WANT Branding team consulted with us to understand the consumer we wanted to attract and the category in which we were competing. They aligned with us on our objectives and determined which types of brand names would be the best fit.

There were two or three rounds of names presented for our consideration and feedback. We started with dozens of options in the first round and ended up with just a handful.

What was the team composition?

Three members of the WANT Branding team were involved, led by Jonathan.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

Working with the WANT Branding team to develop a new brand name was an incredibly valuable exercise. All internal team members and senior leaders gave positive feedback on the approach and results. The name inspired several campaign themes and will help the brand come to life when it launches.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

WANT Branding took a consultative approach and solicited our actionable feedback about the options presented to us during each phase. Because the process was clearly defined in the beginning, the flow was very smooth from beginning to end.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

WANT Branding clearly has expertise in brand naming across many categories. They have the ideal balance of creativity and practical trademark knowledge.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Product Naming for CPG International Company

“[He] was able to be the salesperson, the subject matter expert, and the delivery person on the project.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
2014 - 2016
Project summary: 

WANT Branding led a workshop, advised, and facilitated a group discussion to develop a product name. After investigating and presenting their findings, they guided the group to their collaborative selection.

The Reviewer
 
10,000+ Employees
 
Atlanta, Georgia
Barry Markwick
Former Senior Design Manager, Kimberly-Clark
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The product is now on the market and has been well-received, garnering good feedback. WANT Branding worked well with the group to listen and inform, collectively shaping a unanimous decision. Jonathan exceeded expectations with charismatic leadership and deep expertise in his field.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I was formerly the senior design manager for Kimberly-Clark Professional, a CPG international company. I was responsible for a lot of the creative work both internally and with external vendors and agencies to help us on a number of strategic initiatives.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with WANT Branding?

We were developing a new suite of product in an area that was new to us. We were looking for someone to help us come up with naming conventions, understanding a good fit with regard to brand positioning.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

It was a very collaborative process. We were working with another agency on a larger piece of the project, and they brought WANT Branding in as their partner. WANT Branding conducted a fact-finding discussion with the other agency, put together a proposal, and then did the work. They held a workshop where we worked through the background of the project. They also brought a point of view to the table around naming and best practices as well as thought leadership on where they believed that we should go and what we should do. Then, they worked on it for a couple of weeks and checked back with us at various gates in the project.

When we had narrowed it down to a couple of directions, they brought in the services of a visual designer who brought these names to life and showed them in various real-life situations, whether it was at a tradeshow booth or literature on a website, to give us a flavor of how that name might live and exist in the real world.

They also advised us about names which may be problematic in different languages in terms of translation and also different cultural meanings globally.

What is the team composition?

We worked with Jonathan (Managing Director, WANT Branding).

How did you come to work with WANT Branding?

We were initially connected by another agency who had brought them in as a partner.

How much have you invested in them?

We spent around $30,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked with them from the spring of 2014 until 2016.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

The product came onto the market last year and has been well-received. Feedback was very positive.

It was a very collaborative and iterative process to come up with the final selection. It was a very thoughtful project. It wasn’t a case of them going away and coming back at the end with a name they thought we should move on with. Most, if not everybody, was on board with the name when it came out. There was a lot of agreement and consistency.

How did WANT Branding perform from a project management standpoint?

They did great. They were a great vendor, and Jonathan is a great relationship builder. He is also a great workshop leader, presenter, and facilitator. We were very happy to work with him directly. I’ve looked for other opportunities to collaborate with him because I enjoyed that experience.

What did you find most impressive about them?

The personal touch and the deep knowledge that Jonathan has in this space was impressive. I felt very comfortable working with him and the rest of the team did as well. He brought a lot of great qualities to the table and was able to be the salesperson, the subject matter expert, and the delivery person on the project as well.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I would be interested in knowing if they have more skills to provide. If they were to try and grow their business by having a broader set of skills to offer, it might be advantageous.

5.0
Overall Score I still think fondly of the project even though it was a couple of years ago. I would like to have future opportunities to collaborate with them.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    There were no issues. They accomplished every task we asked of them.
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    We didn't put it out to competitive bid, so I don't have a lot of comparisons. For the work they put in and what we got out, it was probably fair.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They delivered everything that was expected of them and we even had a couple of extra revisions. I was more than pleased with the end result.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    I would recommend WANT Branding. I enjoyed working with them.
Verification

Clutch verification provides an additional layer of data to help you make the right purchasing decsion of business services. Learn more

Verification Level
Gold
VERIFIED
Business Entity
Status
Active
Jurisdiction of Formation
New York
ID
2867169
Date of Formation
Feb 7, 2003
Last Updated
Apr 26, 2019
Payment & Legal Filings
Bankruptcy
No
Tax Lien Filings
0
Judgement Filings
0
Collections Count
0
Last Updated
Jun 19, 2019
Client Reviews
VERIFIED CLIENT REVIEWS
49
OVERALL REVIEW RATING
4.9
Source
Clutch
LAST UPDATED
September 11, 2019