Perpetual is a full-service digital agency providing software design and development solutions to Fortune 500s, startups, and everything in between.
We were founded in New York City in 2012 and since then, we have delivered several digital projects in various industries ranging across financial services, media, healthcare, insurance, and more.
We take a user-experience-first approach to software development, and we believe that building the right product is as important as building the product right.
Our founding team has vast experience in software design and development in the industry, with experience at organizations like Verizon, Reuters, IAC, GE, Code & Theory and McKinsey. We bring you the best digital approaches and solutions the industry has to offer.
We were ranked as an Inc. 5000 fastest growing company in the US in 2021, and rated as the top design agency in New York City in 2022 by Visual Objects.
Our Services
UX Research
UI/UX Design
Web Development
Mobile Development
Corporate Innovation
Startup Services
Product Strategy
Technology Consulting
AI Consulting and Development
UX Design Services
User Experience Research
User and Stakeholder Interviewing
Wireframing
Visual Design
Interaction Design
Product Branding
Graphic Design
Rapid Prototyping
Legacy App Redesign
Design Systems
Development Specifications
Technology Services
Web App Development
Front-end Development (HTML/CSS/JS)
Back-end Development (Python/PHP/RoR/Java/.NET)
Javascript Development (Custom, Angular, React, Node)
Mobile App Development (Android/iOS)
Systems: AWS, Google Cloud
Advanced Software Implementation
Solution Architecture
System Integration
Infrastructure Management/DevOps
Quality Assurance
Why us?
One-stop shop for design and development
User centered and design driven approach
Advanced technology expertise
Pragmatic and collaborative development methodology
"Everyone I work with is sharp, organized, and willing to work and go the extra mile."
Jan 13, 2022
Senior Marketing Manager, Financial Services Firm
Anonymous
Financial services
201-500 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
Perpetual repurposed an existing website as part of an acquisition deal, modifying the site's content and structure to reflect service offerings. They redesigned the Sitefinity website's backend architecture.
Digging into the client's goals and identity upfront, Perpetual accurately implemented the client's requirements in the new website. They roll with the punches and are quick to get started, jumping into the established scope. Customer can expect a truly knowledgable and customer-focused team.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
We’re a financial services asset management firm that manages about $160 billion in primarily public sector and institutional assets. The other side of our business — prior to being acquired — worked with municipalities and other public sector entities to issue debt.
I was the senior marketing manager within our centralized marketing group. My general role was to work across the organization to build our strategic marketing plans and help business leaders execute on them.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We’re using Perpetual for a number of projects, including redesigning two of our websites.
When our asset management business was acquired, we had to split our website from our old organization and build a new one based on an existing template. We also had to update, remove, and orient the old one for the successor firm that would spin off from the acquisition.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
To start, we created a carbon copy of our website, and Perpetual streamlined its content to use as a new framework. There were many differences, including removing content, creating content and building new sections and pages. Perpetual tried to repurpose as much of the site as possible but largely redesigned its backend architecture.
While they handled the technical development, we created the design in-house and worked with their team to implement it and build any necessary components. We’re using Sitefinity as the CMS. Notable features include a tool that transforms resumes into PDF files and a carousel on our home page that highlights our different products and services.
Perpetual also brought in a subject-matter expert to perform an ADA review of the website.
What is the team composition?
We’re working with 3–4 people, including Amish (CEO), Kumar (Project Manager), a systems engineer, and a few others depending on our needs, like a UI/UX designer and an ADA compliance expert.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
About one-and-a-half years ago we started a larger scale technology process across our larger business. After an RFP and due diligence process, Perpetual was number one. They did a phenomenal job building an online client access portal, so when we needed to do this website redesign project, we decided to call them. It was a no brainer.
How much have you invested with them?
We’ve spent between $75,000–$150,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We’ve been working with them since January 2021 and have a monthly retainer with them for support and ongoing management and development of the website.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
It’s ironic that we don’t have many statistics on the website given that we’re a finance firm, but the biggest plus about Perpetual is that we were able to successfully redesign, reorient, reimplement, and launch an entirely brand new website for a $160 billion asset manager during an acquisition process. The outcome of their work is self-evident of Perpetual’s quality. We wouldn’t have been able to do it without them.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
They’ve done very well. Everyone I work with is sharp, organized, and willing to work and go the extra mile. Their team helps us keep a lot of things straight.
Perpetual is probably tired of me at this point, but we have weekly and bi-weekly check-in calls, as well as emails. They send progress reports and are effective at communicating across disconnects, particularly between technical people and design people.
In terms of tools, we leverage Figma and Jira.
What did you find most impressive about them?
It’s two-fold: their flexibility and adaptability. Perpetual is quick to jump in to find resources get the scope moving without issues. At the outset, they quickly adapted to our needs.
Based on different providers I’ve worked with, Perpetual invests the most in us as a client. In fact, they followed up with me four times to get this review call with Clutch scheduled. They’re incredibly client-oriented, and it shows in how they interact with us.
Finally, the amount of time they took up front to understand our business, qualify it, and understand what we were looking was great. It allowed them to accurately translate our requests later on in the project. It was a great discovery phase.
Are there any areas they could improve?
There were times where they built something that was close to what we wanted but also didn’t quite work for us, and we had to go over it a few times. Because of the deadlines, we could have been more explicit with how we were communicating, but the nice part is that they’re extremely flexible.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
It’s important to be open, honest, and transparent about pricing, scope, and budget. Tell them what you need and be deliberate on discovery calls, providing the required context. All their folks are open and transparent, so if you need something just talk through it with them. As a client of theirs, this method has allowed us to be very successful.
"They provided a lot of guidance and thought leadership."
May 30, 2018
Director of R&D, Media Provider
Anonymous
Media
New York City, New York
51-200 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
Perpetual designed and developed an app for Google Glass when the technology was still in its beta stage. They also helped to build a new form factor for the app's content.
Although the project required a great deal of research and innovation, Perpetual delivered high-quality work every step of the way. They effortlessly handled the responsibilities normally assigned to a much larger team, constantly offering helpful advice and dedicated support.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I am the former director of research and development (R&D) for a media provider.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We needed to develop an application for Google Glass when it was a beta product. We wanted a pilot that could demonstrate the capabilities of our content provider.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
We passed on some design sketches to them. The goal was to debut a new technology to the public. In doing so, we wanted to build a content library that would introduce content to Google Glass and seed the app store. We wanted to be an early adopter of all kinds of new technologies. We used the development process to get closer to Google’s goals and play with a new form factor for our content.
What is the team composition?
Since it was a small build, we communicated directly with one developer. We were also in contact with Amish (Head of Product Development, Perpetual). Having Amish as our lead person was very helpful; he was invested in our success.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
We were referred to them, and the referral played a big role in the selection process. Their cost was also competitive.
How much have you invested in them?
We spent between $50,000–$100,000. It was a competitive hourly rate.
What is the status of this engagement?
We worked together from January–August 2013.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
Working with their team was great. They figured out a new technology and worked with us to build a form factor. They provided a lot of guidance and thought leadership. Amish was very smart and creative. We leaned on him a little more than we might have done if we were just working with a developer on a standard product build, simply because we needed a lot of analysis and creativity to reach our goals.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
They were great. We didn’t have our own development team, and I’m not a technical person, so they did things like basic blocking and tackling. They really carried me along, setting up API keys and basic AWS. They helped a lot with that and took ownership of it.
What did you find most impressive about them?
At the time, most people who built Google Glass apps had their own development teams. It was especially heavy lifting to get them to understand our use case and the new technology, but they did so very well. They have a team overseas and traditionally work on larger, routine stuff. Our project was unique, but working with them was still great.
RATINGS
4.5
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
4.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
4.5
NPS
Web Platform Development for Financial Services Firm
Custom Software Development
$10,000 to $49,999
Jan. - July 2015
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Willing to Refer
5.0
"We’re very happy with how the platform performed."
May 11, 2018
Product Manager, Financial Services Firm
Anonymous
Financial services
London, United Kingdom
11-50 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
Perpetual worked on UI/UX design and web development, using Ruby on Rails based on Amazon Web Services. They worked with available APIs and embedded video players.
The platform is high quality and performs well, continuing to function effectively three years on from its development. The team was transparent, carefully tracking their work, and ensuring they were always responsive and communicative throughout.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the product manager of a financial services firm that delivers news and data products to customers.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We were retiring a website that was developed a number of years ago. We had to rebuild it completely from scratch. We wanted a new UI based on Amazon Web Services (AWS). We didn’t have the resources to develop the frontend application in the timeframe we wanted.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
We brought them in to do the UI/UX work as well as the web development. Our site is a video website and is heavily video based. They have the expertise and knowledge about how to develop such websites. They were working with APIs that we have available, as well as embedded video players to rebuild the site.
They used Ruby on Rails based on AWS. They used video technology from a company called Kaltura. They were working with the Kaltura video player and API to develop the overall experience.
What is the team composition?
We mainly worked with Amish (Head of Product Development, Perpetual), who is the head of the team. He was the project and product manager. We also worked with Matthew (Product Designer, Perpetual), who was the head developer, and there were some other developers involved.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
Our company has historically worked with Perpetual but our specific team hadn't. We found them through prior business arrangements and word of mouth. Historical knowledge and expertise is why we went with Perpetual.
How much have you invested with them?
$25,000–$50,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We worked together from January 2015 until July 2015.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
We’re very happy with how the platform performed. It was developed in a very short period of time, so we weren’t sure whether it would stand the test of time, but it certainly has. The developers who have taken it over are very happy with how it’s performing. We haven’t had to really make any changes at all from their original deployments. We’re very happy with how it’s working.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
The project management is pretty good. We mainly worked with Amish—he was our project manager in that phase. We shared documents online to track timelines and open tickets. We had an open view into the work they were doing. They were very open and transparent, which is what we needed because we had very strict timelines to meet.
What did you find most impressive about them?
The quality of the UI/UX is very impressive. We gave them free rein to develop the website as they saw fit in the timeframe. They came up with a UI/UX that was very unique and novel in that short time. To then meet that design with good development was also very impressive.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
Transparency is crucial. Communicate the ideas that you have and show them to them clearly and quickly.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
4.5
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
Web Dev & Design for VR Shopping Startup
Custom Software Development
$10,000 to $49,999
Dec. 2017 - Feb. 2018
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
“They were really comprehensive in their approach.”
Mar 21, 2018
CEO, Obsess
Neha Singh
Information technology
New York City, New York
11-50 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
Perpetual built a design-oriented WordPress website with videos and virtual reality features and implemented a custom 360° viewer for desktop and mobile. They also implemented SEO and an SEO plug-in.
Perpetual’s creation perfectly represents the vision and branding and contains all of the desired features. Despite the complexity of the project, the site went live within deadline. And, due to their excellent work with SEO, the site now has the number one Google ranking.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the founder and CEO of Obsess. We’re a startup building an augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) platform for experiential shopping. We help brands and retailers create beautiful 360° web and mobile-based AR/VR experiences.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We wanted to redesign our website. Our previous website was a single Squarespace website. We’re a software as a service (SaaS) platform, and most SaaS platform websites are pretty boring and standard. We cater to the fashion, home, and lifestyle industries, and I wanted our website to be really beautiful and interactive. I wanted to do the design part very collaboratively because I had the aesthetic direction of where I wanted to go but not the skills to do the design. We don’t have anyone on our team that does web development.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
They built us a WordPress website. One feature is directly related to VR. Our landing page has a 360° image at the top. That’s a part of our product and we wanted to give a teaser of it. Perpetual implemented a custom 360° viewer that works on desktop as well as on mobile. As you move your phone around, the 360° image moves.
We focus on mobile AR/VR and we wanted to have a lot of videos showing inside an iPhone X, which was complicated. We have a lot of auto-playing videos on the site and the ability to turn sound on and off. On mobile, it has to work differently because you can’t auto-play videos. It was a complex implementation because we wanted it to be so visual, interactive, video-based, and 360° image-based.
SEO was part of the website development as well. We had the number two Google ranking for virtual reality shopping platform or augmented reality shopping platform with our old site, which was just a single page. We wanted to maintain and improve that search ranking. They implemented a special plug-in in WordPress that helped us custom-set every field that we wanted, and they advised us on how to do the rest of the SEO.
They also implemented the capability to schedule a demo through our website and to sign up for the newsletter. We get an email every time somebody signs up for a demo and it is also saved into a spreadsheet.
What is the team composition?
We had one designer, one developer, and a project manager.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
They were highly recommended by someone who had worked with them. We looked at 2–3 other teams. We ended up going with Perpetual who was local because, after I talked to their designer, I felt he was great and we could work in a very collaborative way. This was so design-intensive and I really wanted to make the design really innovative and unique.
How much have you invested with them?
We spent $10,000–$25,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We worked together from December 2017–February 2018.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
Our experience was really good. The website is live. They were able to capture what I was looking for, making the website alive, different, unique, modern, and interactive. They translated that design very well for mobile. I was impressed with the implementation. They took on all of our complicated pieces and delivered everything on time.
We now have the number one Google ranking for virtual reality shopping platform or augmented reality shopping platform with our new site. The site was much easier to optimize for SEO.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
We met with the designer initially and we were all on Slack. We used Google Sheets to track the status. There were no communication issues. They were responsive.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They were really comprehensive in their approach. They advised on all the things related to the website. They created a unique experience that represented our brand, our offering, and how we wanted to position it in the marketplace. They were able to capture that to my satisfaction.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
Describe your business objective to them. They will give you ideas after they learn about our business. If you collaborate with them in the design process, it can help both the client and them implement it in a much better way. The more you work together, the better result you’ll get.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"We received good value out of what we did."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I highly recommend them.
Australian Army Education Platform
Custom Software Development
$10,000 to $49,999
July 2016 - Feb. 2017
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"They completed the work within a tight timeline and managed expectations effectively as it progressed."
Jan 30, 2018
CEO, WhetstoneX
Mark Wales
Education
Melbourne, Australia
1-10 Employees
Online Review
Verified
Perpetual designed and developed an online course prototype interface. The team worked on a tight schedule to design and develop an instructor interface, video capabilities, and test options.
The final product was considered as a finalist in a competition and was the finalist with the best overall design. The team managed the projected well in terms of schedule and communication. Perpetual delivers what they’re asked for to high-quality standards.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I am the founder and director of WhetstoneX. We provide army education courses online.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire Perpetual?
I hired Perpetual to complete a detailed prototype of an online course with sample content for an Army First Aid course.
What were your goals for this project?
My goal for this project was to create a compelling user interface with a course structure in place to show the design aspects of what we intended to achieve. We hoped this would win us a to contract to build a $1 million AUD military course.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
We chose them because they had extensive experience in online education, particularly with EdX.
Describe the project in detail.
The project was designed to provide a clickable interface for a military course called Army First Aid. This involved a detailed design phase, design meetings, and several iterations of the prototype. The prototype incorporated all of our technical military requirements, including an instructor interface, a student dashboard, video link requirements, and online testing modules. A secondary product included detailed online course descriptions with a video explaining how to use the product.
What was the team composition?
The team composition consisted of a UX designer, an engineering team, and a project manager. The project manager was instrumental in setting design objectives and meeting key project milestones. I met with the designer and the project manager in person; they were technical and quick to understand and deliver the product.
The build phase test team consisted of a UX designer, two frontend software engineers, three Python software engineers. For the deploy phase, which lasted two months, we had a UX designer, a frontend software engineer, and two Python software engineers.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What outcomes or results can you share that demonstrate progress and/or success?
The demo they made is no longer available online, but as a prototype, it was outstanding in its quality and had a unique UX style.
How effective was the project management?
Their project management was excellent, from accuracy of work the schedule, to communications and leadership. They completed the work within a tight timeline and managed expectations effectively as it progressed.
The final product's quality was amazing. Our submission beat 29 companies and was considered as one of three finalists. I was told our design was the best, but we did not win the competition due to pricing.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
They deliver what they say they will. The company completed exactly what they said they would to standards that were above expectations. Overall, I found them to be incredibly easy to work with and really fast and accurate with requests.
What tips or recommendations do you have?
My tip is to engage them early. Tell them what you need, not how to do it, and they will deliver. I have strong confidence in them and would use them again.
RATINGS
5.0
"They're a world class ed-tech and design firm from end-to-end, and they're reliable."
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"They delivered well above what was required on time."
Schedule
4.5
On time / deadlines
"They met all needs"
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"They only charge 70% what they're worth."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I would refer them anytime. They're outstanding.
UI Redesign for Financial Services Firm
UX/UI Design
Confidential
Aug. 2017 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
n/a
Willing to Refer
5.0
“They are experts in UI development.”
Jan 19, 2018
Product Management, Financial Services Firm
Anonymous
Consumer Products
New York City, New York
501-1,000 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
Having developed mockups and a UI for a .NET-based, real-time news services application, Perpetual is currently assisting in QA testing of the platform.
Testing has resulted in no technical issues, thus showing promise of a successful undertaking. Perpetual’s mockups provided visibility into the end product. Their organized, talented, and innovative project management allocated resources efficiently to ensure timely delivery.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
Our business develops products for the wealth management space. I’m involved with product management.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We needed help in rebuilding our user interface.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Perpetual redesigned the UI for our .NET-based web app which functions as a news viewer. They designed the entire user interface, built the mockups, listened to client feedback, created a detailed spec, and participated in the entire development cycle.
We went into the project very quickly because our app had already been in place for 10 years. They completely redesigned it without breaking the underlying foundation which all our users come through.
What is the team composition?
Amish [Head of Product Development, Perpetual] was our main point of contact, and he had a designer, developer, and one other person on his team.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
Amish has worked on a number of projects across our firm. We needed to develop our product quickly. He was also familiar with the application in which our news app was going into, and the fact that he knew how to integrate it was a skill we valued. We didn’t consider anyone else. He had the skills and was already working with our team.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working together in August 2017, and the engagement is ongoing.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
We needed to turn it around very quickly, and Amish was able to do it. It went from concept to established project in a matter of two weeks. The redesign is in QA testing right now. We plan on deploying in another month.
Users have received the platform extremely well. We’re very excited about how well it’s performing. We haven’t experienced any technical issues.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
They’re very responsive. They worked 24/7. We had threads going back to 11:00 at night where Amish was still online. His responses were very good and well-thought out. He didn’t just respond through his phone, but was actually online.
What did you find most impressive about them?
Amish’s team came up to speed very quickly. The mockup phases provided visibility into the end product. Once we approved it, he was very organized in keeping track of everything. They quickly built very detailed specs, including one that was 125 pages long.
They also participated in the development process. His team now participates in QA and logs bugs directly into Jira. They also validate this data and educate the developers on how to implement things. Amish is very talented and innovative.
They are experts in UI development. They were also really good at moving team members in and out as we needed them during the process.
Are there any areas they could improve?
I don’t have any suggestions.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
The biggest thing is being able to see the designs very quickly. Tools such as InVision allow next-day visibility and prevents anyone from having to go through the project blindly. This also allows for quick feedback and more easily facilitates an Agile process.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
n/a
Value / within estimates
"I wasn’t involved in the financial side."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
Custom Software Dev for the Client of Information Security Startup
Custom Software Development
$10,000 to $49,999
Aug. - Dec. 2016
4.5
Quality
4.5
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Willing to Refer
4.5
“I was very satisfied with Perpetual in terms of the creativity that they brought.”
Jan 19, 2018
Cofounder, Information Security Startup
Anonymous
Information technology
New York City, New York
11-50 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
Perpetual worked on a custom software development project for a third party information security product. The software monitored data and ensured the data was secured and encrypted.
Despite some difficulties with the third-party’s understanding of the scope, Perpetual brought innovative solutions to the table, keeping a professional focus and dedication at all times. Their management of the project was smooth, efficient, and ensured they met all deadlines and budget requirements.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I am a co-founder and CEO of an information security startup. We provide professional services in information security. We also develop products in information security to handle certain enterprise functions in a much more secure way.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We were contacted by my client who needed a solution in the information security space to deal with medical devices. This was an area in which we required particular expertise at a medical device level and understandings of some device protocols and lower-level data flows. We didn't have that specific expertise and it would take some time for us to pick it up. I reached out to them because they did have that, and they understood these issues much better than we did.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
We had to invent technology for my client. He wanted us to create a little black box that sat between a medical device and a hospital's IT network. We created the software that would be installed on the black box to do the monitoring of data going between the hospital IT network and the medical device to make sure the data is secure and encrypted. We had to research and invent software and capabilities that could do that.
What is the team dynamic?
There were two resources assigned to the project: One primary engineer who did a good deal of the research, and one architect/senior project manager who did some of the research and also helped manage the time involved, the scheduling, and some of the coordination. From a technical side, they probably had more than a half resources and a quarter for project management.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
I found them through my professional network.
How much have you invested with them?
We spent $40,000 to $50,000 with them.
What is the status of this engagement?
We worked with them from August to December 2016.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
My client had some trouble understanding the broader picture of how such technologies work and how they could live in a hostile IT environment. They had some misunderstandings about alternate requirements that they wanted to create.
Perpetual's professional focus was awesome in the sense that they actually understood and were able to test various scenarios that we could use. They then brought them back to the client to explain how different possibilities could work to clarify the picture that ultimately should have been clarified by the client themselves.
I was very satisfied with Perpetual in terms of the creativity that they brought, some of their solutions, and ultimately their professionalism as well: how they attended meetings and reported their time. I was quite pleased with what they did.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
They were good. We had client issues; the client would sometimes change dates and we would have to adapt to that. Despite that, they were quite on time and we knew how we were paying them and where the budget was going. It was quite organized.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They’re very creative folks. They stick to their word and deliver what they say they will. I had a good comfort level in depending on them doing this kind of work. That was a very positive thing. Not everyone delivers exactly as planned or as they say, but Perpetual do it quite well.
Are there any areas they could improve?
Nothing that I can think of. Things were positive. The client had questions that would come up, but nothing on their side.
RATINGS
4.5
Quality
4.5
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
4.5
On time / deadlines
Cost
4.0
Value / within estimates
"They're very good but they're not inexpensive."
Willing to Refer
4.5
NPS
Online Learning Platform for English Language Education Training
Custom Software Development
$50,000 to $199,999
June 2017 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
4.0
Schedule
4.0
Cost
4.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
“The fact that they went ahead and really worked with the end user exceeded my expectations.”
Jan 16, 2018
Cofounder, Yola Institute
Anonymous
Education
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
11-50 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
Perpetual is customizing an Open edX English language learning platform. Users are able to receive personalized and auto-generated content in Vietnamese, and parents are able to track student progress.
An extensible, usable learning platform is now available for two hundred students and parents. Perpetual’s team has remained supportive and flexible throughout development. Process transparency, accessible product insight, and an accommodating approach fosters confidence in their abilities.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the co-founder of one of the leading education companies in Vietnam. We focus on English language training and critical thinking skills development for students 5–18 years old.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We were looking for a learning management system solution. We needed it to cover administrative tasks for our school, help us create different types of learning activities, and create semi-personalized students experiences. We decided to look for a vendor to work with us in building an Open edX platform.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Our model is unique in that we include parent information in the student experience. Perpetual’s UX designer flew to Vietnam for a few weeks to interview Vietnamese parents, students, and teachers. We customized the platform for the parents to include the Vietnamese language and simplified what they could track in terms of student progress. We wanted the students to have a personal vocabulary box where they could click back and receive auto-generated exercises. This was a technical and design challenge that was not an off-the-shelf solution.
When users go to the platform, they receive personalized content and can highlight vocabulary words they wish to learn. The system uses this information to self-generate different types of exercises. We’re building an online/offline integrated experience.
What is the team composition?
Their team provided a designer, a technical architect, and a business analyst to work together with our curriculum developers.
Matthew [Product Designer, Perpetual] and the main business analyst were both key team members.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
I found them on a website’s list of companies that build learning management systems with an Open edX base. Perpetual’s portfolio had visible clients and schools in both India and Africa. It showed me that they could set up different environments other than in a U.S. K–12 or university setting. We are neither of those, so a flexible partner was important to us.
How much have you invested with them?
We’ve spent $100,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working together in June 2017, and the engagement is ongoing.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
Our pilot courses have used this platform. There are about 100 students and 100 Vietnamese parents using the site. This year, we need Perpetual’s continuous support to roll it out to the entire school of more than 15,000 students. It’s exciting.
Working with Perpetual is comforting because they know this is an MVP (minimum viable product] but that we want to evolve into bigger things later on. We had to take this into consideration when making certain product revisions or prioritizing some things over others. Amish [Head of Product Development, Perpetual] was very supportive.
The students love that they now have more learning resources. There are a couple of minor design features that we still want to improve to make them more child-friendly. It’s also not as colorful as we wanted. We are making continuous improvements. The parents also like it a lot because they can now see what their children are doing and learning at home. They key goal that we achieved is that the platform is available anywhere, any time. This is exciting to the teams.
The next step is bringing it to more teachers and establishing more content creators within our school network. We have more than 200 teachers. It will be very interesting for us from the school perspective to see how that happens.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
There were weekly catch-up calls during the first couple of months. Afterwards, our project exploded with features, and many weren’t on a parallel workflow. I provided feedback to the team that wasn’t efficient at the time because we only had a weekly, one-hour phone call. I may have forgotten what I designed and they weren’t able to keep track. Perpetual’s business analyst then set up a tool where I could track development and the different sprints to see exactly what stage each feature was at, which was really helpful.
The main business analyst keeps in daily contact to answer all of our questions. Our curriculum developers aren’t tech-savvy at all, but she helps to make sure everyone is at the same level of understanding. As they develop the content, she doesn’t mind working with us on minor details or connecting us to their technical architect for the bigger solutions.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They created a few video recaps and instructions for me and our content development team to transition us into how to use the platform from the studio/content development perspective. The fact that they went ahead and really worked with the end user exceeded my expectations.
Are there any areas they could improve?
There were a lot of technical challenges with our requests. Generally, every 1–2 weeks we saw the development and went through with further iterations. It’s not like everything was documented in a user request and then built upon. We worked together as one team. In terms of their time management and budget, they could’ve been more aggressive. The collaborative aspect was good, but was also time consuming when it came to testing and making improvements.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
4.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
4.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
4.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
Outsourced Software Dev for Education Technology Company
Custom Software Development
$10,000 to $49,999
Apr. - July 2016
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
“The value we’ve received from their services is great.”
Jan 9, 2018
CTO, ProctorU
Matt Jaeh
Education
Birmingham, Alabama
11-50 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
Perpetual integrated existing functionality and an API into an edX XBlock. They also assisted with multilingual support to facilitate the app’s transition and internationalization.
Perpetual delivered a solid solution comprised of clean, efficient, and effective code. Their communication was reliable and convenient despite having a multinational team, and they understood scope and requirements with ease. An overall accurate and transparent process established trust.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the CTO of ProctorU. We watch people take tests online with webcams and microphones.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We needed to create an edX XBlock integration for a fairly large customer.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
They were able to take our API and existing functionality and integrate them into the edX XBlock.
One particular challenge we faced with the end client was that we needed the core functionality to be in French. The application was originally developed entirely in French, and Perpetual had the flexibility that allowed them to handle multilingual support, which was great. We had the app reengineered to be transitioned and internationalized.
What is the team composition?
We had two project managers and two–three engineers during the initial engagement.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
We wanted to find someone who was familiar and experienced with creating edutech software—specifically edX’s XBlock platform. We did an online search for such developers, and Perpetual was one of the very few we found. We initially contacted four or five of those other listed shops, but none of them really understand what we were trying to accomplish. We ultimately ended up reaching out to Perpetual to create the integration.
How much have you invested in them?
We spent at least $20,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We began working with them in April 2016, and the project was completed in July 2016. We also had them do some updates recently, and the relationship is ongoing as they work on other things.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
All vendors advertise their technical prowess, but Perpetual actually delivers what they promise. They actually came through with a solid solution and implemented pretty much exactly what we discussed. From a technical perspective, the code is very clean, efficient, and effective. The value we’ve received from their services is great.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
They performed really well. The communication was great, and they always kept me informed. They did a really good job estimating the project we were doing. We utilized Scrum and Agile approaches when working on user stories, tasks, and other things. As the product owner, they kept me up to date on each sprint.
They have team members both in the U.S. and India. I’ve worked with other development shops that have presence in both places, and the time difference can sometimes be an issue. However, we never experienced any issues with Perpetual. All meetings, check-ins, and communication were all convenient to me, as opposed to having to work around the time difference.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They say what they are going to do and are easy to work with. It was a good experience, and I have nothing negative to say about it. They did a really good job of understanding the requirements and scope.
Are there any areas they could improve?
I can normally find things wrong with most teams, but Perpetual met my own internal development team’s expectations and integrated right into the process.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
Take a look at their website and how they present themselves. The next thing to look at is their response time, how persistent or not persistent they are, and what their communication cycle is like. Take a look at how well they communicate when they are actually being spoken to, and if they recommend interviewing them and asking questions about their cycle, expertise, etc. Find out what they know.
It’s a little different for me because I have a set of expectations for my engineering team, so any outsourcer I use has to be on par with them. A lot of the stuff that is submitted has to go through and pass an internal code review before we deploy to production. Look for samples of their projects to gain an idea of what their code quality looks like, and ask them what their discovery process, software, and methodologies are. Ask about price considerations depending upon where their team and labor is sourced.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I am highly likely to recommend them.
Web Dev & Design for E-Commerce Furniture Startup
Web Development
$50,000 to $199,999
July 2017 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"They've gone above and beyond, and I would very much recommend them."
Jan 8, 2018
Product Manager, E-Commerce Furniture Startup
Anonymous
Consumer Products
New York City, New York
1-10 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
Perpetual provided both frontend and backend development for an e-commerce site. They used a Shopify framework, but added a number of custom features on top of the standard template.
The site functions glitch-free. Perpetual worked proactively to immediately address any development concerns. Their expertise helped prioritize project goals. A full-range of dev capabilities paired with affordability made Perpetual a reliable partner for a startup.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m on the operating side of an online, direct-to-consumer furniture business.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
We needed to create an e-commerce site to launch our business.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Perpetual provided both frontend and backend development for our mobile-optimized site. They used Shopify, but we had specific product needs–including an unusual amount of variance–which required a lot of customization on top of the standard Shopify template.
What is the team composition?
We've working with three people, including a manager, frontend developer, and UX designer.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
They were referred to us by a branding agency we work with. We trusted their recommendation, so we hired them and haven’t found need to work with any other developers.
How much have you invested with them?
Around $50,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working together in July 2017 and our relationship is ongoing. The site launched in September and we keep them on a retainer contract because we've had such a good experience.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
Like any new website, we're constantly seeking feedback from users to optimize the UX. In terms of development, the website functions without any glitches and we've received zero complaints.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
We're very satisfied with their work. If there was ever a bug, they caught the error and fixed it immediately. We never had an issue with deadlines and they were always available.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They're very good at helping the client prioritize and hone in on their exact goals. They also hold themselves accountable. They've gone above and beyond, and I would very much recommend them.
Are there any areas they could improve?
Honestly, no. We're really happy with their work.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
The fact that they have both frontend and backend capabilities makes Perpetual a reliable partner for any startup. As an outsourced development team, they’ve been excellent.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"If there's ever a roadblock, they communicate the issue early on."
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"They charge a fair price for high value."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I've already referred them.
Outsourced Software Dev for Custom Software Consulting Firm
Custom Software Development
$10,000 to $49,999
Aug. - Dec. 2015
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
“[They were] efficient, and I felt like I could trust them to deliver the work while I focused on other projects.”
Jan 8, 2018
Owner, Baumer Designs LLC
Paul Tannenbaum
Information technology
Santa Barbara, California
1-10 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
After building a prototype and deciding the project required extra manpower, Perpetual was hired to build out and customized edX software on behalf of the in-house developer.
They were highly professional, straightforward, and intelligent with their work. Their team was well-managed and their final code required few edits.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
My business is Baumer Designs, and it's a web development consulting firm. I do most of the work, but I have a few subcontractors, and we build custom software for various clients.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Perpetual?
A medical school department had hired me to build out a piece of software and I was overloaded with other client projects at the time. I subcontracted Perpetual to build out the software while I performed due diligence and oversaw the project.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
The software the client wanted was edX, an e-learning platform that lets students and instructors post course content. My client was repurposing it to distribute medical content to people in third world countries, so Perpetual did some custom coding in addition to the overall setup.
What is the team composition?
It wasn't a large project, so I worked with a project manager and one developer, although there was a second developer who helped out briefly.
How did you come to work with Perpetual?
I had built a prototype for my client, so I knew what the project entailed. While I could have done the work myself, I didn't have the manpower nor the expertise to turn it around quickly, so I decided to reach out to a third party by drawing from edX's list of preferred coding vendors. I talked with about 5 firms before choosing Perpetual.
As someone who builds software, I know what I'm looking for. I liked their owner's technical background and straightforward manner, and he gave me good timeline estimates right away based on the detail I provided about the project. Of the vendors I reached out to, he was the most professional, and his pricing was also very fair.
How much have you invested with them?
We spent somewhere between $15,000–$20,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started the project in late August and it lasted four or five months.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
They were installing a piece of open-source software, so about 95% of it didn't require any modification, but they handled the additional custom requirements well. The developer I worked with the most was very intelligent and produced quality work.
How did Perpetual perform from a project management standpoint?
They were highly communicative. They documented the project well and were clear about their handoff process. They also provided a clear timeline for deliverables and stuck to it. Everything was well-managed from their side.
What did you find most impressive about them?
The project itself was pretty straightforward, so I don't feel like this was an opportunity to really put their team to the test, but everything they did was very professional. They were responsive whenever I asked for something; their emails were concise and articulated well in terms of their needs or problems they encountered. Our process was efficient and I felt like I could trust them to deliver the work while I focused on my other projects. We didn't have to do much QA at the end, either, aside from the usual little tweaks. I've had issues with clients before where the end product doesn't feel complete or I've had to micromanage, but this went very smoothly.
Are there any areas they could improve?
The project dragged on a little bit beyond our original timelines and they pushed to wrap it up quickly at the end, so I had to push back and request more time to finish my side of things before we declared it officially complete. I wouldn't say that was a negative experience, but it felt a bit forceful. It might've been due to the timing at the end of the year; they were trying to complete the project for Q4, which made sense, especially given the delay.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
Finding the right vendor is tough. I'm lucky because I'm a developer myself and I can review the code or give clear, concise directions about what I need, but it's challenging for people without that background to even know where to begin. Even if you're not a developer, it helps to have somebody on your side who can check on the vendor and ensure they're on the right track. A lot of my work is actually performing due diligence on outside vendors—making sure the work proceeds properly and that the code is both logical and correct based on the demands of the project. But it can really be a crapshoot. Some of the people you get are amazing, but some are really bad. If you find someone good, hang onto their number and hire them for your next project.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
Clutch verification provides an additional layer of data to help you make the right purchasing decision of business services.