What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
As far as Nathan’s performance, he did a great job. He was very creative and incorporated great ideas into the work. He was successfully able to implement the content we needed while also utilizing his own vision. Nathan positively influenced the project and his creativity helped us produce strong work.
How did Nathan Lee Bush Video perform from a project management standpoint?
Nathan was very easy to work with. We have a pretty tight system in place and he was very well-versed in how to handle the workflow. In addition to following the protocol well and being organized, Nathan was also able to lead himself creatively. He was open to feedback and receptive to our needs, but also able to do the work independently.
What did you find most impressive about them?
Nathan’s autonomy and creativity stood out to us. He meshed well with our team but was also self-sufficient. Recently, I brought Nathan onto a project at my new job, and we had an easy integration with the existing team. He has an eye for the creative and technical work.
Whereas some editors can skew work to match their own ideas, Nathan was great at looking at the work holistically and strategically. In a digital world where people are bombarded by visual stimulation, Nathan is aware of how to create strong, practical final products. He was one of the better editors I’ve ever worked with and I appreciated his influence on the project.
Are there any areas they could improve?
If I had to think of something to improve, it’d be beneficial for Nathan to continue improving his animation abilities. In the current landscape, it’s important for editors to continuously strengthen their skill sets.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
Give Nathan enough direction to get him going, but don’t be so prescriptive that he doesn’t have any creative freedom. The sweet spot is finding the right balance and flexibility.